Abstracts & Papers in Session 2
The aim of this paper is to explore the transformation of work-family balance policies in Taiwan in recent ten years. In response to the changes of circumstances in family structure, labour market, fertility pattern, and so on, the Taiwanese government has implemented a series of policy changes to facilitate work-family balance. These policies involve the restructuring of childcare responsibilitiesbetween the state, the family,and the market.
The focus of this paper will be on two policy areas: leave policies and Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) policies. The main issues which this paper attempts to address are the forms of changes in the two policy areas and the factors which lead to these changes. In terms of leave policies, this paper will review the enactment of Gender Equality in Employment Law and the implementation of parental leave benefit. It will compare the policy making processes of the two policies and analyse the factors which make them different. In the area of ECEC policies, this paper willillustrate the development of ECEC policies in three policy dimensions: finance, regulation, and provision. Moreover, it will provide explanations on why thesepolicies show different levels of changes in the three dimensions.
This paper will explain policy changes through the perspectives of institutions and ideas. It aims to explore how previous policy framework, policy ideas and discourses, and the interaction between them affect the policy making. The findings of this paper would be helpful to understand the transformation of the Taiwanese welfare system and the process of welfare reform.
Taiwan has experienced the structural change in labor market after 1996 due to the intensified globalization and deindustrialization trend in general, and the increasing outflow FDI investment in China in particular. The unemployment rate has increased above 2% since 1996 and reached around 5% in 2002 and 2009 respectively. A series of policy measurements have been adopted to address the unemployment problems: the legislation of Unemployment Insurance Act (2002), The Act for Protecting the Massive Laid-Off Workers (2005), Projects for Sustainable Job Creation (2002-), Wage Subsidy Programs (2003-2010), Decentralizing Work Training Programs (2000).
The above mentioned programs focused on unemployed workers. Most of the target groups are male aged workers (50-65), which are specified as 'old-risks'affected groups. However, new groups also emerge during the industrial reconstruction process: the lone parents, youth workers and disabled workers. They are categorized as the affected groups of 'new risks'. After 2008 financial crisis, it seems these groups have become the focal groups of Taiwan's active labor market policy (ALMP). The policy considerations are more related to the so called 'social investment' strategy and linked to the consideration of adapting to knowledge-based post-industrial economy.
The economic development model of Taiwan had been characteristic with 'growth with equity' and enjoyed low unemployment rate with hyper-growth during 70's-80's. However, the structural change and challenges from globalization and deindustrialization pose huge challenges to the labor market in Taiwan. This paper aims to evaluate the policy outcomes of the policy measurements since 2000 for addressing the problem of working poor. Comparing with other East-Asian countries, the characteristics of Taiwan's work-welfare governing system and its nexus will also be examined in the final discussion.
Korea has been experiencing the problems of employmentand poverty against the backdrop of globalization. The 1990s wasa turning point for Korea in terms of economic and welfare policies.Since the 1990s the GDP growth rate of Korea has been decreasing, and the global economic crisis pulled downthe growth rate to a negative one.Korea searched for a new way of adjustment in both economic and welfare policies, and employed social policiesas instruments for the economic recovery, in particular, their labour markets. Consequently, Korea has started to examine how to link welfare and labour market policies.
The efforts were not only for extending social protection itself but also forseeking ways to link welfare policies with labour market policies, active labour market policy (ALMP).Employment Insurance and the National Basic Livelihood Security system arethe cases in which the government sought to link welfare and labour marketpolicies.Employment insurance consists of four programmes: an employment stabilizationprogramme, a job skill development programme, unemployment benefitsand maternity and parental leave benefits.While Employment Insurance is designed only for the unemployed whohave paid work experience, the National Basic Livelihood Security systemis for the vulnerable group generally. It basically assists those who make lessthan the minimum cost of living, but it also works as an inducement to makethem participate in or return to the labour market. Thus, the National BasicLivelihood Security scheme is complementary to the Employment Insurancescheme.
In this article, we examine the characteristics of the link between welfarepolicy and labour market policy in Korea, and review the development of ALMPs of Korea since the late 1990s. New strategies reflect the characteristics of the existingwelfare and labour market policies, and simultaneously show the possibility ofinstitutional innovation.Thus, the analysis of the link betweenwelfare and labour market policies in will provide a startingpoint to understand how seek to deal with the problems ofsocial protection and job provision within the existing institutional frameworkof welfare and labour market policies, and enable us to examine the futuredirection of the development of the welfare policies in Korea.
Hong Kong has been quoted as the most liberal economy and also a model of residual welfare. As commonly conceived, the social and economic system is characterized by a free market and low level of public intervention, with heavier emphasis on self-reliance through engaging in economic activities - work. Simultaneously, the social protection system was a social assistance scheme - Comprehensive Social Security Assistance (CSSA) - serving as a safety net for those who cannot support themselves through work or other means of living.
While work - signifying the virtue of self-reliance - has been the core of Chinese society as well theHong Kong society, stable and continuous work has been a concern early 1990s resulted from massive relocation of local capital, especially manufacturing industries to Mainland leading to displacement of labor force. Investment in employee retraining programmes was adopted in early 1990s as the earliest form of Active Labor Market Policy (ALMP). With deepening concern in the increasing reliance on social assistance after the Asian financial crisis, the workfare programme - Support for Self-Reliance Scheme - was adopted in 1999 to motivate those claimants back to work. Since 2000s, a greater variety of ALMP has been introduced, covering more target groups, aiming at sustaining or improving the persons' employability and pushing those social assistance claimants back to work.
This paper provides a review of the development of ALMPs in Hong Kong since late 1990s. The scale was in line with the severity of consecutive economic crises and the political pressure resulted. While with greater emphasis (and hence cultural approval) on work, condemnation on those able-bodied social assistance claimants has been intensified. Nevertheless, review shows that the scale of social assistance scheme has not been trimmed down, and the expense on ALMP programme is still relatively small. This, on one hand, shows that passive labor market policy - social assistance - cannot be trimmed down easily given the worsening economic conditions with disproportionate impacts on those vulnerable labor groups; and on another hand, the limited scale of the ALMP.
China's labour market experiences a massive change in recent years. From early 1980s to late 1990s, this country was reported with an unlimited supply of surplus labour, majorly from the rural regions. While the protests of the state owned enterprises (SOEs) laid-off workers had forced the government to introduce a retraining scheme for the urban citizens in 1990s, active policy to promote employment for the rural-urban migrant workers is minimal. In the recent years, however, this policy direction has experienced a gradual change, due to the pressure from a new phenomenon of 'shortage of labour' (min gong huang), unstable employment relationship and the raising labour cost in China. With the introduction of a number of new regulations, for examples, Labour Contact Law and Employment Promotion Law in 2008 and Social Insurance Law in 20011, the government has increasingly intervened into the labour market.
While all of these new legislations have strengthened the labour protections by guaranteeing workers rights with economic and social rights, its implementations have also created new problems. Labour Contract Law attempts to regulate employment relations and stabilize the labour market by promoting permanent contract, but it also gives loopholes for the employers to use dispatched labour. The Employment Promotion Law urges for local initiative for skill training and job searching service, but it gives rise to a new abuse of the massive usage of student interns for lowering the labour costs. As for the Social Insurance Law, it aims to provide a framework for the social protection for all of the population, essentially covering the migrant workers. However, its enforcement in the local context is still uncertain.
This article, one the one hand, provides a sociological account for the development of the Active Labor Market Policy (ALMP) in China; on the other hand, it provides a critical evaluation for the policy with empirical evidences.
Recent years have seen a range of studies emerging to reflect on growth and development in later period of life despite increased experience of the "new risks," the risks that were not seriously considered in the past. These include limited familial support due to non-existence of extended families, rising proportion of dual-income families, increased number of disruptive family events such as an adult child's addiction, incarceration, or death (Goodman, 2003; Waldrop & Weber, 2001), and lengthened life expectancy.
This study is particularly interested in the well-beings of grandparents who provide child care to their grandchildren and describes how the grandparents' life satisfaction levels differ according to their age groups. The circumstances faced by grandparents who voluntarily or involuntarily become caregivers for their grandchildren are complex. Since successful feelings of well-being in old age are considered to be important (Neuhaus & Neuhaus, 1982) in this rapidly growing aging society, we are determined to investigate the potential strain as well as personal growth and enrichment of this vulnerable population in rearing grandchildren.
Previous studies were either studies based on small non-representative samples (Jendrek, 1993; Kelch-Oliver, 2011; Waldrop & Weber, 2001) or focused on a specific diagnosis as an outcome of care experience (Minkler, et al., 1997). The analyses of this study rely on panel data from the Korean Longitudinal Study of Ageing (KLoSA), Waves 1 and 2 that were collected in 2006 and 2008. The survey was conducted in households with respondents who were 45-year-old and older in Korea. Life satisfaction was measured using a combination of subjective life satisfaction questions in regards to relationships, economic status, leisure, and health. Multiple regression analysis is used to identify the effects of child care responsibility on grandparents' psychological well-being and life satisfaction between age groups.